Home > General Error > General Error Socket File Descriptor Exceeds Limit

General Error Socket File Descriptor Exceeds Limit

We Acted. Is the problem with compiling or could this be resolved by configuration? The time now is 11:00 PM. - Contact Us - Unix & Linux - unix commands, linux commands, linux server, linux ubuntu, shell script, linux distros. - Advertising - Top Explore Labs Configuration Deployment Troubleshooting Security Additional Tools Red Hat Access plug-ins Red Hat Satellite Certificate Tool Red Hat Insights Increase visibility into IT operations to detect and resolve technical issues his comment is here

Product Security Center Security Updates Security Advisories Red Hat CVE Database Security Labs Keep your systems secure with Red Hat's specialized responses for high-priority security vulnerabilities. Now i am facing "file descriptor exceeds limit (4096/4096)" error frequently on the server. Let me know if I can provide > more info. > > Dale > > > $ dig +short version.bind chaos txt > "9.7.0-P1" > > $ uname -a > Linux I can circumvent the specific error by running named with the "-S 256" option, which will allow named to setup the socket, but once started, named is not responsive to queries https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2010-April/079835.html

What's the result of named -V? > $ uname -a > Linux ha1.example.com 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5PAE #1 SMP Thu May 7 11:14:31 > EDT 2009 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux For a busy recursive View Responses Resources Overview Security Blog Security Measurement Severity Ratings Backporting Policies Product Signing (GPG) Keys Discussions Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Virtualization Red Hat Satellite Customer Portal Private Groups In any case, the assertion failure should be a bug, but right now I have no idea about how it happened. --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing The use of this option could even be harmful because the specified value may ex- ceed the limitation of the underlying system API.

Learn more about Red Hat subscriptions Product(s) Red Hat Enterprise Linux Quick Links Downloads Subscriptions Support Cases Customer Service Product Documentation Help Contact Us Log-in Assistance Accessibility Browser Support Policy Site So, changing it is like using a bandage to cure cancer. Edit /etc/system: Code: set rlim_fd_max 8192 set rlim_fd_cur 8192 Then reboot. Issue What does 'file descriptor exceeds limit' message in bind log file mean?

The parameters name tcp_rexmit_* come to mind here. Here are some we have used on systems with loads of tcp/ip traffic. org> Date: 2010-05-03 19:22:44 Message-ID: m26334pz7f.wl%jinmei () isc ! The -S option comes with the following warning in the BIND Administrator Reference Manual : -S #max-socks Allow named to use up to #max-socks sockets.

org [Download message RAW] At Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:53:44 -0700, Dale Kiefling wrote: > We have a Bind 9.7.0-P1 instance that is throwing the following errors: > 21-Apr-2010 16:59:00.173 Let me know if I can > provide more info. > > Dale > > > $ dig +short version.bind chaos txt > "9.7.0-P1" > > $ uname -a > Linux Some parms have to be set on clients as well. com> Date: 2010-04-30 23:18:43 Message-ID: q2peb90f15e1004301618jba262039l688a4cd711d9d37c () mail !

You may also want to google around for tuning tcp on solaris to see other values. https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-04/msg00029.html Diagnosing the problems with these is somewhat touchy-feely in that you can make a change and see no noticeable effect or a big (postive or negative) change. Please help me on this issue! I have upgraded the same from 9.6.1 to 9.8.1-P1.

Even if you increase the FD limit it's quite likely that the server hits other scalability issues. this content WARNING This option should be unnecessary for the vast majority of users. URL: Previous message: [dns-operations] darkreading article on EDU signing Next message: [dns-operations] bind issue- file descriptor exceeds limit Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] Also read your documentation to see if there are recommended settings.

Index Nav: [DateIndex] [SubjectIndex] [AuthorIndex] [ThreadIndex] Message Nav: [DatePrev][DateNext] [ThreadPrev][ThreadNext] Other format: [Raw text] BIND9.9.2-P1 throws general: error: socket: file descriptor exceeds limit (128/64) From: Chris Wiesner weblink If you have any questions, please contact customer service.

Read the paragraphs below BEFORE you do this! ulimit -Hn and ulimit -Sn report 8192. Thank you advanced Mika -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Solution Unverified - Updated 2014-07-23T02:08:35+00:00 - English No translations currently exist.

Search Forums Show Threads Show Posts Tag Search Advanced Search Unanswered Threads Find All Thanked Posts Go to Page... learn linux and unix commands - unix shell scripting 18-Mar-2012 gmail ! It may work for a while, but it is probably not fixing the problem. We Acted.

phillipsoasis Hardware 0 07-21-2011 10:38 PM Log Size Exceeds Limit dewaraja Shell Programming and Scripting 6 03-10-2009 06:47 PM Log Size Exceeds Limit dewaraja UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 0 I would play around with these on a running system, check your values first. Join Date: Feb 2004 Last Activity: 16 October 2016, 8:32 PM EDT Location: NM Posts: 10,836 Thanks: 450 Thanked 971 Times in 902 Posts The per process limit for descriptors in http://imagextension.com/general-error/general-error-cannot-open-control-file.php Read the man page for initscript and inittab. > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Dale Kiefling > wrote: > We have a Bind 9.7.0-P1

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Dale Kiefling wrote: > We have a Bind 9.7.0-P1 instance that is throwing the following errors: > 21-Apr-2010 16:59:00.173 general: error: socket: file Wasn't sure if limits.conf would help or not. I did not found earlier posts on this issue, but is so could you please point me a place where to dig. So, if your named was built --disable-epoll, I'd suggest you to rebuild it with enabling epoll (which should be enabled by default on your Linux system) and try again.

Need access to an account?If your company has an existing Red Hat account, your organization administrator can grant you access. Log Out Select Your Language English español Deutsch italiano 한국어 français 日本語 português 中文 (中国) русский Customer Portal Products & Services Tools Security Community Infrastructure and Management Cloud Computing Storage JBoss I suspect that the root cause is the settings you maintain for /dev/tcp with the ndd command. They are not.

Open Source Communities Subscriptions Downloads Support Cases Account Back Log In Register Red Hat Account Number: Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance My Profile Notifications Help Log It is therefore set only when the default configuration causes exhaustion of file descriptors and the operational environment is known to support the specified number of sockets. Current Customers and Partners Log in for full access Log In New to Red Hat? vel4ever Shell Programming and Scripting 4 01-07-2012 09:34 AM How to Clone a Drive with 512 byte Sectors to a Drive with 4096 bytes/sector (AF)?

We are running bind-9.4.3-P3 and once in a while logs say: > general: error: socket: file descriptor exceeds limit (1024/1024) However our server (red hat) ulimit is 2048 (ulimit -n). Password Home Search Forums Register Forum RulesMan PagesUnix Commands Linux Commands FAQ Members Today's Posts Solaris The Solaris Operating System, usually known simply as Solaris, is a Unix-based operating system introduced Last edited by DukeNuke2; 03-18-2012 at 12:52 PM.. This does not mean they are a perfect choice.

Red Hat Account Number: Red Hat Account Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance Customer Portal My Profile Notifications Help For your security, if you’re on a public Usually, heavy duty sockets apps require ndd tuning. Thanks, Chris --- $ /usr/sbin/named -V BIND 9.9.2-P1 built with '--srcdir=/usr/src/ports/bind/bind-9.9.2-P1-2/src/bind-9.9.2-P1' '--prefix=/usr' '--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/bin' '--sbindir=/usr/sbin' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--datadir=/usr/share' '--localstatedir=/var' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--datarootdir=/usr/share' '--docdir=/usr/share/doc/bind' '-C' '--enable-shared' '--disable-static' '--disable-backtrace' '--disable-linux-caps' '--without-dlopen' '--with-dlz-bdb=/usr' '--with-dlz-filesystem' '--with-dlz-ldap=/usr' '--with-dlz-mysql=/usr' Code blocks~~~ Code surrounded in tildes is easier to read ~~~ Links/URLs[Red Hat Customer Portal](https://access.redhat.com) Learn more Close Unix & Linux Forums > Operating Systems > Solaris

Learn More Red Hat Product Security Center Engage with our Red Hat Product Security team, access security updates, and ensure your environments are not exposed to any known security vulnerabilities. The following message is in named log. general: error: accept: file descriptor exceeds limit (4096/4096) What does this message mean? Read the man page for initscript and inittab. As far as I know Linux kernel 2.6 should support epoll, so your named may have been built with --disable-epoll.

© 2017 imagextension.com