Home > Got Error > Got Error 124 From Storage Engine Merge Table

Got Error 124 From Storage Engine Merge Table

The Comments: column was empty. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. I propose to backport bug#35845, which also would help to solve bug#45840. [18 Aug 2009 13:43] Mattias Jonsson This was only affecting myisam, so I will add a small patch there If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql http://imagextension.com/got-error/got-error-124-from-storage-engine-merge.php

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. So I copied the initial datafiles to development servers and moved the 701Mb mysqldump file across. There are 4 indexes on the table - one is an auto-increment primary key, two others are single column non-unique indexes, and one is a 3 column unique index involving two

In mysql 4, you could get away with some differences between the definition of the merge table and the underlying tables. Issue replicated. In the first command prompt window I issued a SELECT COUNT and then a SHOW INDEX FROM tablename;. Thank you! Not reproducible on MariaDB 5.3 or MySQL 5.1.

You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/102197 3121 Ingo Struewing 2010-03-03 Backport of revid:[email protected]/june.mysql.com-20080324111246-00461 BUG#35274 - merge table doesn't need any base tables, gives error 124 when key accessed SELECT queries Luckly we did not need a change request so I issued the ALTER TABLE tablename ENABLE KEYS; command on all six servers to resolve the issue. The servers are load balanced so data can go into the least busy server, but this does not affect anything. This along with the "changes" to the migration process, that led me to the mysqldump script as the cause.

If I run a check table on this table I get the following: +-----------------+-------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Table | Op | Msg_type | Msg_text | +-----------------+-------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------+ | my_db.my_active | check | error | But the same thing happens again on the next insert. Thread• Got error 124 from storage enginestutiredboy25Aug • RE: Got error 124 from storage engineGavinTowey25Aug • Re: Got error 124 from storage enginestutiredboy26Aug © 1995, 2016, Oracle Corporation https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=35274 SELECT ...

The table in question has about 19 million records and is part of a merge table with a much larger compressed archive table. This session was originally scheduled for October 15th but had to be postponed for technical reasons. In the Comments: column, which was previously blank, it now said disabled. Changed in maria: assignee: Igor Babaev (igorb-seattle) → Timour Katchaounov (timour) status: In Progress → Confirmed Igor Babaev (igorb-seattle) wrote on 2011-11-03: #2 This bug can be reproduced with the following

Key based reads are now allowed for merge tables with no underlying tables defined. @ mysql-test/t/merge.test Backport of revid:[email protected]/june.mysql.com-20080414125521-40866 Modified a test case according to fix for BUG#35274. But I left this report in same category to let team to decide. [24 Mar 2008 11:16] Bugs System A patch for this bug has been committed. Solution was to allow index reads on disabled indexes if there are no records. @ mysql-test/r/partition.result Bug#46639: 1030 (HY000): Got error 124 from storage engine on INSERT ... Thanks a ...ERROR 1030 (HY000): Got Error 127 From Storage Engine in Mysql-generalHi, I am running MySQL 4.1.8-Max-log on two Linux machine (machine A and machine B).

Facebook Google+ Twitter Linkedin Discussion Overview Group: Mysql-general asked: Aug 25 2009 at 07:23 active: Aug 26 2009 at 03:55 posts: 3 users: 2 Related Groups MysqlMysql-backupsMysql-benchmarksMysql-clusterMysql-commits Recent Discussions Resizing Image useful reference I'm getting the above error on insert to my database. My question is, If i set default engine as INNODB Whether it will make any misconduct on other MYISSAM databases? select * from rappresentanti NATURAL JOIN clienti; is the same as: select * from rappresentanti r JOIN client c ON r.cognome=c.cognome AND r.nome=c.nome AND r.vita=c.vita AND r.citta=c.citta AND r.prov=c.prov AND r.cap=c.cap

One thing to be checked here is whether result set from SELECT is first correctly stored in a temporary table. [17 Aug 2009 3:09] Roel Van de Paar Possible workaround may SELECT ... Out of curiosity I did look at MySQL 4.1 artical and was surprised to find Bug #20357 made it all the way through to MySQL 5.1.12 & 5.1.31. my review here It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party. This configuration has been working fine for years, with no recent changes.

If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

For a period of time it will constantly return with an error 12. Post navigation SSIS: Read SQL Script files and Output to .csvfiles Don't Code Because YouCan Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here... Thanks. Hopefully somebody can give me some insight!

It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. Problem was that when bulk insert is used on an empty table/partition, it disables the indexes for better performance, but in this specific case it also tries to read from that get redirected here Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.

Being tied to the application layer, sharding is hard to export and to interact with. powered by phorum Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql SELECT ...

SELECT ... I should mention at this point, everything was tested and signed off on the development servers and we created a particular mysqldump command to do the job. Vikram A...Innodb Dealing With Blobs In 4.1: Error 139 From Storage Engine in Mysql-generalHi, with mysql 4.1[234], importing a dump of Innodb tables containing at least a blob field I invariably Contact Sales USA: +1-866-221-0634 Canada: +1-866-221-0634 Germany: +49 89 143 01280 France: +33 1 57 60 83 57 Italy: +39 02 249 59 120 UK: +44 207 553 8447 Japan: 0120-065556

Use info->tables instead. [26 May 2010 9:57] Konstantin Osipov The patch is not in any main tree. [26 May 2010 10:06] Konstantin Osipov Please verify if the bug is repeatable against Regards, Gavin Towey -----Original Message----- From: stutiredboy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Got error 124 from storage engine hi, all: i have met an question

© 2017 imagextension.com