I deleted all of the authentication keys from the sources list and ran Oldmanuk 's script. How should I interpret "English is poor" review when I used a language check service before submission? Sometimes you can just hit on the link from your post and the server may have key info. Why do train companies require two hours to deliver your ticket to the machine? navigate to this website
I talked to the server admins and they said it's fixed again and a more robust mechanism is implemented to prevent it from happening in the future. The time now is 03:38 AM. - Contact Us - Unix & Linux - unix commands, linux commands, linux server, linux ubuntu, shell script, linux distros. - Advertising - Top Message #10 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Eduard Bloch
Bogdan Butnaru (bogdanb) wrote on 2006-09-22: #28 Hi! Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the They are a python folder and a win32 folder. I also installed (unverified!) updates and restarted; no luck.
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. Could Not Execute 'gpgv' To Verify Signature (is Gpgv Installed?) Why must the speed of light be the universal speed limit for all the fundamental forces of nature? Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key
Lyubimkin wrote: > Hello Kurt, hello Eduard. > > The problem is rather clear, but please also run > > 'apt-get update -o Debug::pkgAcquire::Auth=1' and post the output. http://serverfault.com/questions/407417/unknown-error-executing-gpgv Mark Baker (mbaker824) wrote on 2008-09-18: #40 I've been having the same problem with Hardy since a clean install five days ago. Gpg Error: Http://archive.ubuntu.com Trusty Release: Unknown Error Executing Gpgv How? I found it.
Let me know if I can be of any help. I'll be sure to post here if I find anything out, because I think there are others with the same problem. Has this really been the same problem through all these years with no fix? I was showing Ubuntu off and, specifically, the ease in which packages could be installed and uninstalled.
At least the error > message should be changed, or apt should automatically re-download the signature > file for a retry (this usually helps). And please reopen. I will come back as soon as I find anything useful. –Seyed Mohammad Apr 15 '12 at 4:23 | show 1 more comment up vote 0 down vote The only time my review here Geoff's workaround fixed it.
Ben (ben2talk) wrote on 2009-07-05: #62 Ignore last post - all gpg errors returned. I think whatever is causing this sync problem needs to be addressed at the core and dealt with once and for all. sudo apt-key update gpg: key 437D05B5: public key “Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key
Edit bug mail Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else Bug attachments breezy updates release file (edit) breezy updates release signature file (from lists/partial) (edit) sudo apt-get update -o Debug::Acquire::http=True 2>/tmp/apt-http.log (edit)
Make sure the date and time are correct. It seems to happen randomly. Perhaps if apt-get flushed the Release and gpg files every time, would that fix/mask the problem? gpg likes the key and the signature:- gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --verify ~/Release.gpg ~/Release gpg: Signature made Sat 04 Feb 2006 05:11:37 EST using DSA key ID 437D05B5 gpg: Good signature from
And I also noticed that all software that I try to install with Synaptic appears as 'Not authenticated'. There is indeed a problem with them: $ gpgv --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg Release.gpg Release gpgv: Signature made 2005-10-18T00:04:45 CEST using DSA key ID 437D05B5 gpgv: BAD signature from "Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing I suspect for some reason your local copy of the release/release.gpg file is newer than the version on the server and that causes apt to assume that there is no new Is there a role with more responsibility?
Looked a bit closer (strace on the execve args to gpgv called from apt-get) and looked the contents of /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_breezy-security_Release.gpg and var/lib/apt/lists/security.ubuntu.com_ubun tu_dists_breezy-security_Release Which differed markedly! 9. Seems like this is a problem with corrupted downloads. I'd be happy to run any other required tests and provide logs. Try doing the script/terminal instructions above but substitute 'lists.old2' for 'lists.old' and everything should be fine (assuming the problem is, as it claims, that the directory is not empty).
Done W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com lucid Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key
Password Home Search Forums Register Forum RulesMan PagesUnix Commands Linux Commands FAQ Members Today's Posts Ubuntu Ubuntu is a complete desktop Linux operating system, freely available with both community and professional apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jaunty-security/main/source/Sources.bz2 Hash Sum mismatch Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jaunty-security/universe/source/Sources.bz2 Hash Sum mismatch Some index files failed to download, they have Both for datafile and for signature! share|improve this answer edited Apr 16 '12 at 4:09 answered Apr 14 '12 at 12:13 Seyed Mohammad 1,79562237 i have mentioned the output ...problem still persists ...any help will
I shuffled quiet a bit of code around and fixed stuff in https in 0.9.12, so it might as well be "fixed". Are leet passwords easily crackable? How would a planet-sized computer power receive power? Two years later without ever seeing this I declare this done now.
Done [email protected]:~# It still works fine, if I delete all the repository files from /var/lib/apt/lists/: [email protected]:~# rm /var/lib/apt/lists/xubuntu_debian-* [email protected]:~# apt-get -o "Acquire::Languages=none" update Get:1 https://xubuntu squeeze/ Release.gpg [287 B] Get:2 https://xubuntu
© 2017 imagextension.com